After more than a year of hearings and eight and a half days in court, NASCAR finally chose to pull the plug on its antitrust lawsuit, a move that, despite its cost, likely spared the sport from far greater damage. While reports indicate the sanctioning body could owe the two plaintiff teams a combined $364.7 million in damages, closing the case outside the courtroom appears to have been the least harmful option on the table.
Advertisement
The settlement carried significant structural concessions. All 36 NASCAR Cup Series charters are now permanent, or “evergreen,” a shift that grants teams long-term security while boosting franchise value.
Teams will also receive a portion of NASCAR’s international media rights revenue, gain entitlement to one-third of any new NASCAR business deals that leverage team intellectual property, and operate under an agreed-upon five-strikes rule. Each of those changes will reshape the competitive and financial topography in ways teams had long pushed for.
Still, the agreement likely offered NASCAR certainty instead of leaving its future to a judge and jury. For example, although the sanctioning body approved permanent charters and governance updates, the governance terms, while improved, remain written and enforced by NASCAR. That distinction preserved internal authority rather than handing operational control to the courts.
According to Meegan Hollywood, an antitrust litigator at the Shinder, Cantor & Lerner law firm, the settlement allowed NASCAR to retain more influence over how charter changes evolve.
Beyond the financial exposure, NASCAR faced the threat of court-mandated reforms that would have arrived without negotiation or flexibility. By settling, the organization retained the ability to implement changes on its own timeline and under its own framework.
In addition to that, prolonging the fight would have further bruised NASCAR’s public image, which was already under strain. The release of internal messages did real damage, revealing officials disparaging the SRX Series and hurling insults at veteran team owner Richard Childress.
That episode inflamed fans, triggered backlash from another Cup owner, Childress, and drew a public response from Bass Pro Shops, one of the sport’s most prominent sponsors, amplifying the fallout beyond the garage.
The legal exposure did not stop there. In the aftermath of the lawsuit and the Austin Dillon–Joey Logano incident at Richmond, Bobby Hillin Jr. explored the possibility of buying into Richard Childress’ organization. Non-disclosure agreements were executed, and sensitive financial information was intended to remain strictly confidential.
Yet NASCAR somehow obtained Childress’s private records and introduced them in court. That revelation prompted pointed questions from the judge about how the sanctioning body gained access to the materials, raising the possibility of court orders compelling further disclosure.
The moment set off alarms inside the courtroom. Any suggestion of impropriety threatened to erode NASCAR’s credibility in front of a jury. Even if no wrongdoing was ultimately found, the optics alone could have been deeply damaging.
Meanwhile, fan frustration had already reached a boiling point. A full trial would likely have peeled back more coatings of internal conflict, exposing details the sport could ill afford to have aired publicly.
Also, while the damages sought by the teams hovered around $365 million, NASCAR reportedly paid between 10 and 25 percent of that figure, with the possibility of settling closer to 50 percent of the requested compensation. Rather than funnel more money into prolonged legal fees, NASCAR redirected those resources to end the dispute.
