What is Soft Signal in cricket: Suryakumar Yadav catch allures severe criticism for third umpire Virender Sharma in Ahmedabad T20I

Soft Signal in cricket: The much-debated rule of cricket remained the highlight of the Indian innings at the Narendra Modi Stadium.

During the fourth T20I of the ongoing England’s tour of India in Ahmedabad, India batsman Suryakumar Yadav’s dismissal became the topic of discussion.

Replacing injured Ishan Kishan in the Playing XI tonight, Yadav came in to bat at No. 3 in the fourth over. Yadav, who hit a six off Jofra Archer on the first ball that he faced in international cricket, went on to score his maiden T20I half-century in his debut innings to impress one and all.

It was on the second delivery of the 14th over that Yadav tried to sweep England all-rounder Sam Curran only to walk back to the pavilion. While England’s Dawid Malan gave the impression of grabbing a clean boundary catch initially, replays showed a different picture.

What is Soft Signal in cricket?

In the process of completing a catch, Malan fell forward only to create doubts over the catch. With his fingers not being completing under the ball, there was a general notion that the ball had touched the ground.

With the on-field umpire unsure of the dismissal, he referred it to third umpire Virender Sharma. Having said that, an on-field umpire has to present a “soft signal” before asking the third umpire to intervene. A “soft signal” is nothing but a decision which an on-field umpire gives on the basis of a real-time observation before referring a decision to the third umpire.

While the “soft signal” aims at giving more authority to on-field umpires, it also puts them in a difficult position for it is impossible to come to a conclusive decision with a naked eye in certain cases. Another reason why terms such as “soft signal” and “conclusive evidence” face flak is them being subjective to individuals on most occassions.

Following the rules, the on-field umpire ruled Yadav out before referring the decision to the third umpire. Sharma, the man who mattered the most in this case, had to have a conclusive evident before overruling the on-field umpire’s decision.

Despite watching multiple replays from various angles, Sharma was unable to find a conclusive evidence which would have made it clear for him that the ball had touched the ground. As a result, Sharma decided to back the on-field umpire’s decision of ruling the batsman out.

Suryakumar Yadav catch allures severe criticism for Virender Sharma

For more cricket-related news, click here.