Magic Johnson believes Stephen Curry should win the Finals MVP even if the Warriors miss out on the Championship, ESPN analysts have split views.
Advertisement
Whatever anyone says about him being an underperformer in the Playoffs, Stephen Curry, has always been a menace in all of his 6 Finals appearances before this year.
At 34-years of age, he has outperformed himself from all those years where he led his teams to 3-championships averaging no less than his age. He scored 34 points in Game 1, 29 in Game 2 and 31 in Game 3.
What he did in Game 4 though, saved the Warriors from going 3-1 down in the series as well as gave them all the momentum they needed before going back to San Francisco.
The 6’2 point guard had a 43-point double-double in Game 4 with 10 rebounds and 4 assists, which turned a 5-point Celtics lead with under 7 minutes remaining in the game into a 107-97 Warriors win. And it grabbed Magic Johnson’s attention, who said this after the game.
Jalen Rose agrees with Magic Johnson’s take on “Stephen Curry should be FMVP irrespective of the results”, but Stephen A. Smith doesn’t.
Former NBA player and ESPN analyst Jalen Rose echoed Magic’s voice before Game 5 on Monday and said that Steph should win the FMVP irrespective of the outcome of the ongoing Finals, to which Stephen A. Smith had his own say.
As absurd as Smith is most of the time, this isn’t a bad take. In fact, it sounds like a more appropriate one as Finals MVP should be from the team, and it has happened just once that a player from a losing team won the award.
It was Jerry West of the Los Angeles Lakers in 1969, which was the debut year for these awards. Curry can lead his team to two more wins and put this debate to rest. Otherwise, we will be talking about who should have been the deserving FMVP for months and years to come.
