Ponting bats for Smith leading Australia after Paine
Ponting bats for Smith leading Australia: Former Australian captain expressed his views regarding who should be their next captain.
Despite Australia captain Tim Paine doing the best that he can in terms of leading the current Australian team, there are apprehensions with respect to whether he can be a long-term option.
Paine, 34, made a comeback into the Australia Test team after seven years during the Ashes last year. Lesser did he know that he would be leading Australia after eight matches.
All the happenings of Cape Town promoted Paine up the ranks in the Australian setup. Come the ODI series against England earlier this year, Paine was given the leadership role in ODIs as well. With Australia losing the series 0-5, opening batsman Aaron Finch was handed the role, which Paine admitted was always on the cards.
Among one of the notable names to have commented upon who should succeed Paine is legendary Australian captain Ricky Ponting. Speaking during the lunch break on the first day of the Test at Melbourne, Ponting advocated for banned Australian captain Steve Smith to lead the side after serving his ban.
On being asked about Australia’s captain after Tim Paine, Ponting was quoted, “I think it will be Steve Smith when he comes back in. I think that’s the way to go. I think by then he would have served whatever penalty he needs to serve.
“We know he had a 12-month playing ban and another 12-month captaincy staying away from him. But I think he will lead Australia again.”
Watch the full video below:
Who will be the next Australian Test captain?
Ricky Ponting has his say #AUSvIND pic.twitter.com/QDgMyHCHdH
— #7Cricket (@7Cricket) December 26, 2018
It is worth mentioning that Smith’s ban will end in March next year. However, he will have to wait for another 12 months to be able to be eligible to lead Australia again.
Read some of the latest Twitter reactions on Smith below:
“None of the bowlers knew”
Cameron Bancroft was “bullied into it”
Darren Lehmann “had no idea”
Steve Smith “played no part”So it must all be David Warner’s fault? 🤔 pic.twitter.com/PHjj8A6Ebg
— England’s Barmy Army (@TheBarmyArmy) December 21, 2018
Steve Smith on the ball tampering scandal: I walked past something and had the opportunity to stop it and I didn’t do it. That was my leadership failure.
MORE: https://t.co/ykweMevBOK #newsday pic.twitter.com/CE9iEceKhf
— Sky News Australia (@SkyNewsAust) December 21, 2018
Steve Smith says “it’s been well-documented what happened” in Cape Town. No it hasn’t. We still know nothing about the background to the plot and how it was implemented etc etc
— Simon McLoughlin (@simmomac) December 21, 2018
Steve Smith keeps saying he saw “potential” for something to happen and didn’t say anything or said “I don’t want to know”, need to be more specific about what he saw, seems to imply he didn’t know about incident specifically?
— Carter (@cwsbbb) December 26, 2018
yeah I don’t think I’m ready to accept the Steve Smith redemption narrative or that Vodafone is somehow a superior mobile carrier
— andie (@anndeejam) December 26, 2018
Deb sat down with our disgraced cricket captain Steve Smith to find out how he’s dealing with his punishment in the wake of the ball tampering scandal. Don’t miss the full interview, TOMORROW on #9Today. pic.twitter.com/P0Ixkdu3St
— The Today Show (@TheTodayShow) December 26, 2018
About the author
-
Gurpreet Singh •
Are Harpreet Brar and Gurnoor Brar brothers: What is the relation between Punjab Kings’ Brars?
-
Dixit Bhargav •
New Zealand vs Bangladesh Head to Head Test Records | NZ vs BAN Test Stats | Mount Maunganui Test
-
Rishikesh Sharma •
Megan Schutt partner name: Who is Megan Schutt’s wife?
-
Dixit Bhargav •
Ashton Agar opening record in T20: Why is Aaron Finch not opening in today’s 3rd T20I between Australia and Sri Lanka?
-
Dixit Bhargav •
RR vs MI Head to Head in IPL history | Rajasthan Royals vs Mumbai Indians stats | IPL 2021 Match 51
-
Dixit Bhargav •
England Playing XI for first Ashes Test vs Australia: Nasser Hussain wants one big change in middle-order
