mobile app bar

Red Bull Should Have Apologised to Max Verstappen For Wrong Strategy Instead of Calling Him ‘Childish’, Says Peter Windsor

Anirban Aly Mandal
Published

Red Bull Should Have Apologised to Max Verstappen For Wrong Strategy Instead of Calling Him 'Childish', Says Peter Windsor

Max Verstappen was not in the most amicable of moods during the 2024 Hungarian GP. Nursing an underperforming RB20, the Dutchman was taken out of contention for the win because of the strategy handed to him. According to former F1 manager, Peter Windsor, the team should have apologised to the Dutchman for their mistakes rather than calling his frustrated outbursts ‘childish.’

Verstappen was struggling for pace in his upgraded RB20. On top of that, the Red Bull pit wall seemingly allowed Lewis Hamilton and Charles Leclerc to undercut the #1 driver twice. This left him with a mountain to climb in terms of having a realistic shot even at a podium.

In his last stint, the reigning world champion rebuked his engineer, Gianpiero Lambiase for putting him on such a bad strategy. Verstappen was frustrated on the team radio trying to get the third-place back from Hamilton. He then lost his bearings into turn 1, locked up, and made contact with the #44 driver.

In the aftermath of the incident, the Red Bull star told his engineer that Hamilton had been moving under braking and it was in fact the Briton’s fault. To this, Lambiase shot back at Verstappen, calling his rant “childish” and that he should not get into a radio fight with other teams over a possible penalty.

Talking about the radio bust-up, Windsor said, “Childish? I mean who are they [Red Bull] talking to? I cannot believe that a Red Bull employee said that to Max Verstappen in the middle of the race. Red Bull should not have been speaking to Max Verstappen like that – they should have been apologizing.” 

Windsor also felt that Lando Norris was let down by his own mistakes when it came to him conceding his second Grand Prix win to Oscar Piastri.

Peter Windsor feels Lando Norris should have ignored McLaren team orders

After a strange strategy call that allowed Norris to inherit the lead of the race from his teammate, the young Briton was constantly persuaded on the team radio to give the position back to the #81 driver.

Windsor believes that Norris should have just played deaf. When his engineer, Will Joseph came onto the radio, Norris should have either not responded or should have “simulated a cracking noise”.

Windsor also explained that Piastri did not snatch the lead from his teammate on the first lap by pure merit. Hurtling down the inside, it was Norris’ “team player” move to squeeze Max Verstappen that allowed the young Australian to take the lead in the first place.

Post Edited By:Samriddhi Jaiswal

About the author

Anirban Aly Mandal

Anirban Aly Mandal

linkedin-icon

Anirban Aly Mandal is an F1 writer at The SportsRush, with over 1000 articles under his belt, Anirban's love for F1 started when he discovered a copy of F1 2014 on his computer. With over half a decade's worth of time spent religiously following the sport, he’s dived deep into the world of motorsports. However, Anirban's expertise goes beyond just writing - he has also written several academic papers focused on the domain of motorsports and the law. His passion for the sport is so immense that he aspires to work as a legal advisor in the most prestigious racing series in the world someday. When it comes to Formula 1, Anirban finds great pleasure in re-watching classic races and idolizes the likes of Ayrton Senna, Nigel Mansell, and Sebastian Vettel. His top picks include Brazil '91, Silverstone '92, and Germany '19. Outside of the sport, Anirban is an avid sim racer, often found racing on titles like Assetto Corsa, F1 22, and Automobilista. Apart from his interests in gaming, Anirban has a keen interest in philosophy, literature and music.

Share this article